Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 21:17:30 04/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2002 at 13:21:31, Ulrich Tuerke wrote:
>On April 20, 2002 at 03:01:01, Peter Berger wrote:
>
>>On April 20, 2002 at 00:29:10, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>The fact that tiger did no progress in the last moves is not a good reason to
>>>afjudicate it as a draw.
>>>
>>>Tiger has KRN vs K and the game should continue.
>>>
>>>Maybe tiger does not know to win KRN vs K but the 50 move rule are going to
>>>force it to sacrifice the knight and get KR vs K that it knows to win.
>>>
>>>I do not know about the knowledge of palm tiger but it is one possibility.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>You are completely right and I came to the same conclusion. It was partly a
>>technical decision as I was really too tired to watch this game any longer. And
>>I expect exactly the same as you ( the Tiger sacrifices the knight because of
>>the 50 move rule and then will know how to mate). I think I will let them replay
>>this endgame (sigh).
>
>I'd suggest to do something more reasonable instead, Peter.
>I resign this one for Comet (if I'm allowed to) -:)
>
>I'd counted this as a loess anyway,
>
>Uli
You are a gentleman! :)
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.