Author: Kevin Strickland
Date: 21:39:14 04/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
>there are 2 ways to discredit results > a) discredit the guy who gets them > b) discredit the program he gets them with > c) discredit the accuracy the testresults were gotten in > d) start sueing and during the trial disallow results getting posted > >he's trying a+b now. > >Very cheap. > >The real thing he DISLIKES to hear is that >INTEL C++ is FASTER now and it might take another year before >m$ will release a new version of its compiler that can beat it! No I think you took his statement wrong. He was not trying to discredit the compiler results, he was definately trying to discredit the statement that Diep is "professionally programmed". He was taking a shot at you, not Intel. If you read between the lines Danielson you might catch the fly.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.