Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:05:38 04/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2002 at 23:14:30, Kevin Strickland wrote: >On April 20, 2002 at 20:19:21, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On April 20, 2002 at 15:31:02, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >> >>>I would not tell "However to all standards, programming of DIEP is very >>>professionally done" about the programmer who needlessly duplicates tens of >>>megabytes of data only because he did not figured out how to efficiently use >>>threads instead of processes. >>> >>>Or about the programmer who included others' code into his program without the >>>permission. >>> >>>Eugene >> >>Ouch. I guess it was only a matter of time......... >> > >Also note no reply from Vincent... that really must have hurt. I felt it here. > >My only question is what code did he use in his program that he didn't get >permission? If it was from a program like Crafty and I was Robert I would have a >hard time letting one compete in tournaments with a program that included even >one line of my code. By this definition I suspect that almost no program is allowed to compete. My program includes the line: i++; I did not check if this line is in crafty but I am sure that a lot of chess programs with free source code include exactly the same line. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.