Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 02:32:49 04/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 21, 2002 at 00:17:30, Christophe Theron wrote: >On April 20, 2002 at 13:21:31, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > >>On April 20, 2002 at 03:01:01, Peter Berger wrote: >> >>>On April 20, 2002 at 00:29:10, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>The fact that tiger did no progress in the last moves is not a good reason to >>>>afjudicate it as a draw. >>>> >>>>Tiger has KRN vs K and the game should continue. >>>> >>>>Maybe tiger does not know to win KRN vs K but the 50 move rule are going to >>>>force it to sacrifice the knight and get KR vs K that it knows to win. >>>> >>>>I do not know about the knowledge of palm tiger but it is one possibility. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>You are completely right and I came to the same conclusion. It was partly a >>>technical decision as I was really too tired to watch this game any longer. And >>>I expect exactly the same as you ( the Tiger sacrifices the knight because of >>>the 50 move rule and then will know how to mate). I think I will let them replay >>>this endgame (sigh). >> >>I'd suggest to do something more reasonable instead, Peter. >>I resign this one for Comet (if I'm allowed to) -:) >> >>I'd counted this as a loess anyway, >> >>Uli > > > >You are a gentleman! :) Thx. Hmm, don't know. -:) This game is simply a loss. If resign enabled, the DOS-comet would even resign this game. OTOH, you 've got another hint. I think, that's sufficient profit from this game. Why bother Peter to waste his precious time ? Uli > > > > Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.