Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 12:39:17 04/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 21, 2002 at 10:59:56, Tony Hedlund wrote:
>On April 21, 2002 at 00:08:38, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On April 20, 2002 at 14:22:59, Tony Hedlund wrote:
>>
>>>On April 20, 2002 at 13:20:28, Richard A. Fowell wrote:
>>>
>>>>Glad to see those results - keep them coming!
>>>>
>>>>By the way, since Palms range from stock 16MHz Palm IIIs
>>>>to 53MHz overclocked Palm M505s - could you include the Palm MHz
>>>>in the PGN, as you have the "P200" MHz for Tal?
>>>>
>>>>e.g.:
>>>>
>>>>[Black "Chess Tiger 14.9 Palm 28MHz"]
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>Richard A. Fowell
>>>
>>>My m515 with 16 MB RAM runs at 42 MHz. As Chritophe told us, MHz is not
>>>important with Palm. So I find it enough to just have Palm in the header.
>>>
>>>Tony
>>
>>
>>
>>Yes computation speed does not follow MHz linearly on the Palms.
>>
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>Then maybe my Palm is as fast as yours ;-)
>
>Tony
As far as I remember your TigerMark is a little bit less than mine.
Naturally I would have preferred the opposite, because what matters for the
final ranking of Tiger Palm is the performance on yours, not on mine! :)
MHz is not reliable, but the TigerMark index is, IF you are comparing the same
version and IF the test about the clock's accuracy has been made.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.