Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Gambit Tiger played not Chess Tiger.

Author: Otello Gnaramori

Date: 15:06:55 04/21/02

Go up one level in this thread


On April 21, 2002 at 17:57:53, Mark Young wrote:

>On April 21, 2002 at 17:49:36, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>
>>How do you know Mark?
>>In the pgn is clearly stated Chess Tiger....so?
>>
>>Best regards,
>>Otello
>
>Watched the game live. Gambit Tiger was played. Shay said chris wanted Gambit
>Tiger to play instead of Chess Tiger so a change was made.

I'm not particularly happy of this choice, since the "gran campeon de argentina"
was CT 14.0 , but it was a great game anyway...
Gambit is more risky than its big brother, and can be also more vulnerable, we
saw a slight advantage of smir in the middlegame, vanished near the end.

w.b.r.
Otello

p.s. I should have realized it was gambit from the first very aggressive
moves...quite a pawn storm.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.