Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 16:13:40 04/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 21, 2002 at 18:50:12, Mark Young wrote: >On April 21, 2002 at 18:35:53, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On April 21, 2002 at 17:54:45, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>On April 21, 2002 at 17:46:40, Chris Carson wrote: >>> >>>>I am surprised by this, any reason for this? Ofcourse Gambit Tiger is a very >>>>good program, perhaps Christophe thought this style would be better against GM >>>>Smirin. >>> >>>Gambit tiger is a good program...Chess Tiger is better. >>>What killed Gambit Tiger in this game was the set-up. They played Gambit Tiger >>>with anti-human mode on. Gambit Tiger plays much weaker in this mode. Gambit >>>Tiger was lucky to draw the game. Hate to see Gambit Tiger play like this, when >>>I know it can do much better. >> >> >> >>I watched the game live at KC and I asked Shay if antihuman mode was ON. He >>didn't answer, but there was a big flow of comments at that time so he might >>have overlooked my question. >> >>Somebody else said that antihuman was on. >> >>Yesterday I asked Shay to use Gambit Tiger with its default settings, so if >>antihuman mode has been turned on I really do not know why. >> >>If antihuman was on, then it was definitely not a good setup. However I do not >>know if antihuman has influenced this game. > >A few of us were following the game with Gambit Tiger....It only played some of >its moves it played in Anti-Human mode only. If that was not the problem with GT >play then something else was. > >> >> >> >> Christophe Could that something else be INTEL, instead of a good AMD Athlon XP 2100+ Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.