Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Dear Joe,

Author: Steve Maughan

Date: 23:00:27 04/21/02

Go up one level in this thread


Joe,

> Shredder also lost against Gulko. The rest of the programs remain undefeated.
> So what does this tell us? that shredder suxs!!

Posts like these don't go down too well here - and IMO, rightly so.

There are several reasons for this.  Firstly, statistically you can not make any
valid conclusions from such a small sample of games.  Most people here are well
aware of this fact.  Secondly, to say a program 'suxs' is strong and doesn't
tally with Shredder's achievements - from the tens of thousand of games played
by Shredder it is clear that it is an *extremely* strong program - one of the
strongest ever written.  So to say it 'suxs' is seen, by people who are in the
know, as trolling.  Finally, your comments are not exactly constructive.  You're
entitle to your opinions but I think most people here admire the work that goes
into all chess programs so a comment like "program xxxx suxs" seems somewhat
childish.  At the other end of the scale comments like, "I like program xxxx"
are also pointless and not worth posting.  So at least try to be constructive in
your posts.

Regards,

Steve



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.