Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: First(?) test for moderators

Author: Marc van Hal

Date: 10:54:54 04/22/02

Go up one level in this thread


On April 22, 2002 at 03:30:50, Peter McKenzie wrote:

>Looks like the trolls have come out to taunt you guys :-)

I think your right.
If Mr x wants to express his feelings.
Let him.
I even don't see real harm here
I would response with
a) an answer
b) ignore the mesage

For me it is even worse to read this kind of answer from the moderetion
Because I see a trol does get more responses
Then my analyses!
And not only that I had to proof myself over and over again.
But also because somebody else claims he found a position or even worse a new
theoretical novelty.
While it was posted here by me long before he did
Which basicly is the same if  I make a copy of a program
And say that I am the programmer of it.
 And ask you to proof I am not.
That knife cuts on two sides or not?

Even if I have done both making analyses
and proofing myself
And if I contact an IM or GM they simply ignore me.
Which bascly means they know I am the original author.
But don't want me to benifit from it.
(I would be enormous intrested in the why
Or how they would feel if they where threated in the same way.)


It is for you to decide which kind of trolls should be penalized.
I am only showing some facts,and try to show you the way to rightesnes.

Regards Marc



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.