Author: Dan Ellwein
Date: 17:48:07 04/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 22, 2002 at 07:41:12, Ignacio Santos Crespo wrote: >On April 21, 2002 at 22:15:55, Dan Ellwein wrote: > >>On April 21, 2002 at 08:16:10, Ignacio Santos Crespo wrote: >> >>>On April 20, 2002 at 20:31:51, Keith Ian Price wrote: >>> >>>>On April 20, 2002 at 19:23:45, Dan Ellwein wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 20, 2002 at 12:56:06, Art Basham wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>White wins by Rg8..! (good test move)... >>>>>> >>>>>>[D]3R4/5r1p/5ppk/8/1Q3PPq/5P2/6K1/8 w - - bm Rg8; id Quick-08; >>>>> >>>>>on a 400Mhz Celeron computer CMLite finds mate in 10 in >>>>>8 min 19 sec... >>>>> >>>>>Time Depth Score Positions Moves >>>>>0:30 2/12 4.33 1734035 1. Rd1 Kg7 2. Rh1 Qxh1+ 3. Kxh1 >>>>> Rd7 4. Kg2 Kf7 5. Kf2 Re7 6. Qc4+ >>>>> Kg7 7. Qc5 Kf8 8. Kg3 >>>>>8:19 2/12 Mate13 27360287 1. Rg8 f5 2. g5+ Kh5 3. Qd6 Qxg5+ >>>>> 4. fxg5 Kxg5 5. f4+ Kg4 6. Qd3 >>>>> Kxf4 7. Qg3+ Ke4 8. Rd8 f4 9. Qd3+ >>>>> Ke5 10. Rd5+ Kf6 11. Qd4+ Ke7 12. >>>>> Qe5+ Kf8 13. Rd8# >>>> >>>> >>>>Actually, it seems to find a Mate in 13. So is this problem a Mate in 13, or is >>>>there a solution for the Mate in 10? John Merlino earlier posted CM's solution, >>>>which was also a Mate in 13. So perhaps this is a Mate in 13. Anyone found a >>>>Mate in 10? >>>> >>>>kp >>> >>> >>> >>>On a 1200 Mhz Athlon, CM Lite finds mate in 10 in 13 min 55 sec >>> >>>Time Depth Score Positions Moves >>>0:00 1/5 4.17 20654 1. Rd1 f5 2. Rh1 Qxh1+ 3. Kxh1 >>> fxg4 4. fxg4 >>>0:00 1/6 4.14 28956 1. Rd1 Kg7 2. Rh1 Qxh1+ 3. Kxh1 >>> Rc7 4. Qd2 f5 5. Kg2 >>>0:00 1/7 4.10 48598 1. Rd1 Kg7 2. Rh1 Qxh1+ 3. Kxh1 >>> h5 4. Kg2 h4 5. Qb5 Rc7 >>>0:00 1/8 4.10 113078 1. Rd1 Kg7 2. Rh1 Qxh1+ 3. Kxh1 >>> Rc7 4. Kg1 h5 5. Qe1 hxg4 6. fxg4 >>>0:01 1/9 4.22 202405 1. Rd1 Kg7 2. Rh1 Qxh1+ 3. Kxh1 >>> Rc7 4. Kg2 Rc2+ 5. Kg1 f5 6. Qe7+ >>> Kg8 7. Qe6+ Kg7 8. Qd7+ Kg8 9. >>> gxf5 >>>0:02 1/10 4.27 424611 1. Rd1 Kg7 2. Rh1 Qxh1+ 3. Kxh1 >>> Rd7 4. Kg2 h5 5. Kg3 hxg4 6. fxg4 >>> Rd3+ 7. Kf2 >>>0:04 1/11 4.31 842292 1. Rd1 Kg7 2. Rh1 Qxh1+ 3. Kxh1 >>> Rd7 4. Kg2 Kf7 5. Kf2 f5 6. Qc4+ >>> Kg7 7. Ke3 h6 8. Qe6 >>>0:08 2/12 4.33 1726880 1. Rd1 Kg7 2. Rh1 Qxh1+ 3. Kxh1 >>> Rd7 4. Kg2 Kf7 5. Kf2 Re7 6. Qc4+ >>> Kg7 7. Qc5 Kf8 8. Kg3 >>>1:35 2/12 Mate13 22034536 1. Rg8 f5 2. g5+ Kh5 3. Qd6 Qxg5+ >>> 4. fxg5 Kxg5 5. f4+ Kg4 6. Qd3 >>> Kxf4 7. Qg3+ Ke4 8. Rd8 f4 9. Qd3+ >>> Ke5 10. Rd5+ Kf6 11. Qd4+ Ke7 12. >>> Qe5+ Kf8 13. Rd8# >>>1:39 3/13 Mate12 22973751 1. Rg8 f5 2. g5+ Kh5 3. Qd6 Qxg5+ >>> 4. fxg5 Kxg5 5. Qd8+ Rf6 6. f4+ >>> Kxf4 7. Qc7+ Ke3 8. Rd8 Ke4 9. >>> Qc4+ Ke5 10. Qd4+ Ke6 11. Qd6+ >>> Kf7 12. Qd7# >>>2:01 4/14 Mate12 29500824 1. Rg8 f5 2. g5+ Kh5 3. Qd6 Qxg5+ >>> 4. fxg5 Kxg5 5. Qd8+ Rf6 6. f4+ >>> Kxf4 7. Qc7+ Ke3 8. Rd8 Ke4 9. >>> Qc4+ Ke5 10. Qd4+ Ke6 11. Qd6+ >>> Kf7 12. Qd7# >>>7:49 5/15 Mate11 124305307 1. Rg8 f5 2. g5+ Qxg5+ 3. fxg5+ >>> Kxg5 4. Qd6 f4 5. Qd8+ Kf5 6. Re8 >>> Ra7 7. Kh3 Rd7 8. Qxd7+ Kg5 9. >>> Qg4+ Kh6 10. Rg8 g5 11. Qxg5# >>>13:55 6/16 Mate10 233051199 1. Rg8 f5 2. g5+ Qxg5+ 3. fxg5+ >>> Kxg5 4. Qd6 f4 5. Kh3 Rf5 6. Qe7+ >>> Rf6 7. Rf8 Kh5 8. Qxf6 g5 9. Qg7 >>> g4+ 10. fxg4# >> >>thanks Ignacio for the analysis... >> >>gonna have to get one of those Athlon 1200 Mhz computers... >> >>i didn't give the settings for CMLite in this post, so i imagine you got the >>settings from another post of mine... >> >>Dan > >From http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?224666 > >CMLite > >Own Q 7.7 Opp Q 7.7 >Own R 4.3 Opp R 4.3 >Own B 2.6 Opp B 2.6 >Own N 2.6 Opp N 2.6 >Own P 1.0 Opp P 1.0 > >SS = 12 > >It´s ok ? yes... it's ok :) Dan > >Ignacio
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.