Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 23:45:36 04/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 22, 2002 at 16:58:46, José Carlos wrote: >On April 22, 2002 at 12:35:10, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On April 22, 2002 at 09:19:32, José Carlos wrote: >> >> >>> 1 and 2 are true, and figures can be give to support it. I'm not sure about 3, >>>but seems intuitive. >> >>I'd like to see your data about (2). >> >>-- >>GCP > > I'll search in my rating lists if you want, but I don't think it's necessary. >My program, for example, performs very badly with little time because: I measure >time in seconds (integer); when only 15 seconds remaining (more or less) it >plays instantly until it gets the control. Ok, my program is not the only >program, but the original post stated "some programs", which is true. > Amy is also a good example. It performs bad in very fast games. > > Look at Averno's rating on ICC. Bullet rating is very low. > > AvernoX is a computer program. > > rating win loss draw total best >Bullet 2326 1498 258 140 1896 2464 ( 9-Jan-01) >Blitz 2546 2623 480 229 3332 2697 ( 1-Apr-02) >Standard 2322 751 240 84 1075 2386 (29-Mar-02) > > Now look at crafty. Much better in blitz than in standard. > >Information about ICC member crafty: > > rating win loss draw total best >Wild 1984 333 101 11 445 2204 ( 3-Oct-00) >Bullet 3255 6664 1467 1087 9218 3255 (11-Jun-01) >Blitz 2841 56440 15577 11896 83913 3388 ( 9-Jun-00) >Standard 2489 4752 2308 1964 9024 2792 (25-Oct-00) > > But Diep has lower bullet raing and higher standard > >diep is a computer program. > > rating win loss draw total best >Bullet 3054 1298 27 67 1392 3098 (20-Apr-02) >Blitz 2941 2624 166 246 3036 3148 ( 9-Apr-02) >Standard 2570 719 345 206 1270 2640 (17-Dec-01) > > PostModernist's rating looks like Averno's, but about 100 elo higher. > > PostModernist is a computer program. > > rating win loss draw total best >Wild 2070 14 5 0 19 0 >Bullet 2465 5026 1732 603 7361 2690 (15-Dec-01) >Blitz 2633 28963 6416 4002 39381 2899 (20-Jul-01) >Standard 2451 1833 1238 567 3638 2554 (18-Mar-02) > > José C. These ratinglists are completely seperate (AFAIK), so we can't be sure one list hasn't "drifted" up or down relative to the others. If a program scores worse in in bullet than in Blitz (against humans that is), then I suspect the program has some sort of time management problem, for the advantage over humans in bullet seems very large. -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.