Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:33:32 04/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 23, 2002 at 03:24:08, Jouni Uski wrote: >On April 23, 2002 at 03:12:31, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On April 23, 2002 at 01:35:29, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>...it's still behind Fritz/Tiger in SSDF!? So don't expect too much. >>> >>>Jouni >> >>And if it is improved by 200 rating points? >> >>Assuming as obvious that it does not improve by more than 100 points does not >>make sense. >> >>Fritz improved by more than 100 elo points from the time that hiarcs7.32 came to >>the market. >> >>I see no reason why hiarcs cannot do the same. >>The fact that Hiarcs7.5 and Hiarcs7.8 were not released in the time of Fritz6 >>and Deep Fritz does not mean that these programs do not exist as private >>versions of the programmer. >> >>Uri > >From SSDF: > > THE SSDF RATING LIST 2002-03-27 85022 games > Rating > ------ > 1 Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2748 > 3 Deep Fritz 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2709 > 9 Deep Fritz 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2654 > 15 Fritz 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2623 > 23 Fritz 5.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2554 > 38 Fritz 5.32 64MB P200 MMX 2481 > 44 Fritz 5.0 PB29% 67MB P200 MMX 2460 > >Is there over 100 poits somewere? > >Jouni Yes Fritz7 is 39 elo better than deep fritz. Deep fritz is 100 elo better than Fritz5.32 It means that Fritz7 is 139 elo better than Fritz5.32 The difference between the release time of Hiarcs8 and the previous version is similiar to the difference between the release time of Fritz7 and Fritz5.32 I see no reason to assume that similiar impeovement is impossible. We need to wait and see. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.