Author: Günther Simon
Date: 00:57:06 04/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 23, 2002 at 03:45:58, Günther Simon wrote: >On April 23, 2002 at 03:33:32, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On April 23, 2002 at 03:24:08, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>On April 23, 2002 at 03:12:31, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On April 23, 2002 at 01:35:29, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>> >>>>>...it's still behind Fritz/Tiger in SSDF!? So don't expect too much. >>>>> >>>>>Jouni >>>> >>>>And if it is improved by 200 rating points? >>>> >>>>Assuming as obvious that it does not improve by more than 100 points does not >>>>make sense. >>>> >>>>Fritz improved by more than 100 elo points from the time that hiarcs7.32 came to >>>>the market. >>>> >>>>I see no reason why hiarcs cannot do the same. >>>>The fact that Hiarcs7.5 and Hiarcs7.8 were not released in the time of Fritz6 >>>>and Deep Fritz does not mean that these programs do not exist as private >>>>versions of the programmer. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>From SSDF: >>> >>> THE SSDF RATING LIST 2002-03-27 85022 games >>> Rating >>> ------ >>> 1 Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2748 >>> 3 Deep Fritz 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2709 >>> 9 Deep Fritz 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2654 >>> 15 Fritz 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2623 >>> 23 Fritz 5.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2554 >>> 38 Fritz 5.32 64MB P200 MMX 2481 >>> 44 Fritz 5.0 PB29% 67MB P200 MMX 2460 >>> >>>Is there over 100 poits somewere? >>> >>>Jouni >> >>Yes >>Fritz7 is 39 elo better than deep fritz. >>Deep fritz is 100 elo better than Fritz5.32 >> >>It means that Fritz7 is 139 elo better than Fritz5.32 >> >>The difference between the release time of Hiarcs8 and the previous version is >>similiar to the difference between the release time of Fritz7 and Fritz5.32 >> >>I see no reason to assume that similiar impeovement is impossible. >>We need to wait and see. >> >>Uri > > >Sorry, but I have to disagree here as it seems you forgot to look at >the hardware specs also. Only DF and F7 used the same speedy hardware >and all other versions must be extrapolated to their processor speed >which diminishes the differences between all versions a real lot. > >Regards, >Günther Forget about my last post! I noticed too late that you of course have done some extrapolation with the assumed increase of ~55Elo between a K6-2 at 450 and the Athlon 1200 derived from the difference of DF on both hardware versions. (Normally I would suppose a higher difference though?) Regards, Günther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.