Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 16:44:23 04/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 23, 2002 at 17:53:28, john c cook wrote: >On April 23, 2002 at 13:51:16, Sune Larsson wrote: > >come on if a gm has a problem how can master do better than a gm That was very far from the claim... Certainly it's not a question of a master doing better than a GM. More that a prepared master just might score much better than you may think. Due to observed comp weaknesses of the grave sort. The two KI exchange games vs Smirin (with an early dxe from white) don't present any greater challenges to a master. The Botvinnik attack, as in Smirin's win, is known as almost killing for the programs. We see drawn endings with comp evals of + 3.00 etc. So IMHO a well prepared and motivated master is going to score points, more than some people think... Sune > > > > >>I would like to see a match of 10-20 games between some top programs >>and a well prepared human player with ELO 2300-2350. Preferably 40/2. >>A result of 8-2 (16-4) in favour of the comps would mean a performance >>of about 210 points above the human (2510-2560). I'm not quite sure >>the comps would make it... IMHO it would be an interesting add to the >>games already played vs GM:s. And by a well prepared human player I mean >>something more than just browsing through the games vs Gulko and Smirin. >> >>Sune
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.