Author: Steve Maughan
Date: 00:15:41 04/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
Stuart, >That is a question of beauty, I think. But chess is meant (imho) to show which >beauty (or playing style) is real and which beauty is false. And that is what >the whole competition of chess is about. > >Therefore, the great playing style is only of true value and beauty, when it >is proven over the board. I admire your search for absolute chess truth! I think we need to make a distinction here between a single game and all possible chess games. There will be a number of games where Hiarcs plays great positional chess that is a pleasure to watch - indeed some, or many, of these games Hiarcs will 'prove' it's knowledge by winning the games. Then there is the question of does Hiarcs always play the best move in every situation - well the answer is no but for a huge number of situations we don't know what the absolute best move is - and due to the massive number of possible chess positions we will never know for certain what the best move is. So in this case I'd appreciate many different styles. This is why I buy many different engines. Regards, Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.