Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Are you amateur? (two interesting positions)

Author: Grzegorz Sidorowicz

Date: 06:28:26 04/24/02

Go up one level in this thread



4 seconds it is not bad result - I think :-)
If program can solve it below 10 second for me is not amateur.
For example GNU Chess have got strange problems with this positions,
but for Phalanx or any commercial program it is not very difficult problems.

P.S.
Armageddon is my program. It is amateur :-)
My log files (on PII350):

depth time    nodes       score   variation
-------------------------------------------
4     0       32645       642     a4c4 e8g6 f6g7 f8g7
5     0       47790       617     a4c4 e8g6 f6g7 f8g7 c4c8 a8c8 c1c6
5     1       113700      103     a4c4 e8h5 f6h4 h5h4 b5d6
5     3       252391      258     f6h4 c8d7 h4e7 d7b5 e7f8
5     6       528533      399     d3f4 e5f4 a4c4 e8g6 f6g7 f8g7 b5d4
5     6       573825      431     b5c7 e8h5 f6h4 h5h4 c7a8
5     7       632420      431     b5c7 e8h5 f6h4 h5h4 c7a8
6     7       654095      456     b5c7 e8h5 f6h4 h5h4 c7a8 e7d5
6     7       691845      473     b5c7 e8a4 b3a4 a8b8 c7b5 g7g6 f6e7
7     10      1013299     448     b5c7 e8h5 f6h4 h5h4 d3e5
7     22      2209232     -42992  b5c7 e8h5 f6h4 h5h4 f1d1 h4h2 g1f1 h2h1 f1g1
c8d7
7     40      3856952     83      d3e5 e8h5 f6h4 h5h4 e5g4 c8g4 f3g4
7     1.9     6426972     264     d3f4 e5f4 b5c7 e8a4 b3a4 a8b8 c7b5 g7g6 f6e7


second position

depth time    nodes       score   variation
-------------------------------------------
4     0       34172       502     f2g3 d6g3 g1h1 g7e5 a7g1 g3g2
5     0       44765       477     f2g3 d6g3 g1h1 g7e5 a7g1 h3g2 b7g2 g3h4 g1h2
h4e7
5     1       107935      434     f2g3 d6g3 g1h1 g7e5 a7g1 h3g2 b7g2 g3h4 g1h2
h4e7
6     2       166625      409     f2g3 d6g3 g1h1 g7e5 a7g1 h3e6 e7f5 g6f5
6     4       334863      372     f2g3 d6g3 g1h1 g7e5 a7g1 h3e6 e7g6 f7g6 g1c5
7     6       434116      347     f2g3 d6g3 g1h1 g7e5 a7g1 h3e6 e7g6 f7g6 g1c5
7     19      1496826     244     f2g3 d6g3 g1h1 g7e5 a7g1 h3e6 e7g6 f7g6 b7b4
g3h3
7     44      3700185     248     c1c2 g7f6 e7d5 h3f5 a7c5 g3e2 g1f1 d6e5
8     1.0     5239557     233     c1c2 g7f6 b7f3 d6e7 f3g3 h3f5 a7c5 f5c2 c5e7
8     1.12    6369533     244     f2g3 d6g3
9     1.46    9309348     219     f2g3 d6g3 g1h1 g7e5 a7g1 h3e6 e7g6 f7g6 b7h7
h8h7 c1c7 e5c7 g1d4
9     2.52    15576796    243     c1c2 g3f1 b7c7 d6c7 c2c7 g7e5 c7b7 f1d2 b1d1
d2e4


>Hi,
>
>I'm not sure I understand the question about being amateur, but PostModernist
>gets both of these in 4 seconds.
>
>Andrew
>
>PS Which engine is yours?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.