Author: Andrew Williams
Date: 07:58:44 04/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 24, 2002 at 09:28:26, Grzegorz Sidorowicz wrote:
Hi again,
I searched the second one for an hour and PM switched to Qf3. (These figures are
on a PIII 933 by the way):
1> 199 0 5 1.fxg3
1= 303 0 361 1.fxg3 Qxg3
2> 303 0 364 1.fxg3 Qxg3
2= 303 0 465 1.fxg3 Qxg3
3> 303 0 522 1.fxg3 Qxg3 2.Kh1
3= 303 0 1126 1.fxg3 Qxg3 2.Kh1
4> 227 0 3177 1.Kh2 Nf5 2.Kxh3 Nxe7 3.f4
4= 242 0 3536 1.Kh2 Nf5 2.Kxh3 Nxe7 3.f4
5> 222 0 10366 1.fxg3 Qxg3 2.Kh1 Be5 3.Qe4
5= 227 0 10706 1.fxg3 Qxg3 2.Kh1 Be5 3.Qe4
6> 155 0 48851 1.Rc2 Qe5 2.fxg3 Qxg3 3.Kh1 Be5
6= 176 0 57418 1.Rc2 Qe5 2.Kh2 Bf5 3.Nxf5 Qxf5
7> 176 1 98866 1.Rc2 Qe5 2.fxg3 Qxg3 3.Kh1 Be5 4.Bc5
7b 181 1 132009 1.Qf3 Qxe7 2.Qxg3 Qxa7 3.Qxh3 Qxa2 4.Qf3 Re8 5.e4
7= 186 1 174783 1.Qf3 Qxe7 2.Qxg3 Qxa7 3.Qxh3 Qxa2 4.Qe3 Rd8 5.Rd1
8> 186 4 374249 1.Rc2 Nh5 2.Qe4 Re8 3.Bc5 Qf6 4.Kh2
8= 200 5 493075 1.Rc2 Nh5 2.Qe4 Re8 3.Bc5 Qf6 4.Kh2
9> 159 15 1493755 1.Rc2 Nf1 2.Qc7 Qe6 3.Rxf1 Be5 4.Qc8 Rxc8 5.Rxc8
9= 179 16 1513967 1.Rc2 Nf1 2.Qc7 Qe6 3.Qf4 Re8 4.Nc6 Bf5
10> 179 22 2151709 1.Rc2 Nf1 2.Qc7 Qe6 3.Qf4 Re8 4.Nc6 Bf5 5.Nd4
10= 185 36 3510520 1.Rc2 Nf1 2.Qc7 Qe6 3.Qf4 Re8 4.Nc6 Bf5 5.Nd4
11> 165 132 12348673 1.Qf3 Qxe7 2.Qxg3 Qxa7 3.Qxh3 Qxa2 4.Qe3 Qa5
5.Rc5 Qa8 6.Rbc1
11= 175 147 14437882 1.Qf3 Qxe7 2.Qxg3 Qxa7 3.Qxh3 Qxa2 4.Qe3 Qa5
5.Rc5 Qa8 6.f3
12> 155 484 43170522 1.Qf3 Qxe7 2.Qxg3 Qxa7 3.Qxh3 Qxa2 4.Qf3 Re8
5.e3 Kg8 6.Rd1 Be5
12= 161 665 58376414 1.Qf3 Qxe7 2.Qxg3 Qxa7 3.Qxh3 Qxa2 4.Qf3 Re8
5.Rd1 Kg8 6.e3 Be5
13> 161 698 62188037 1.Qf3 Qxe7 2.Qxg3 Qxa7 3.Qxh3 Qxa2 4.Qf3 Re8
5.Rd1 Kg8 6.e3 Be5
13= 164 1802 158871337 1.Qf3 Qxe7 2.Qxg3 Qxa7 3.Qxh3 Qxa2 4.Qe3 Qa5
5.Rc5 Qd8
Andrew
>
>4 seconds it is not bad result - I think :-)
>If program can solve it below 10 second for me is not amateur.
>For example GNU Chess have got strange problems with this positions,
>but for Phalanx or any commercial program it is not very difficult problems.
>
>P.S.
>Armageddon is my program. It is amateur :-)
>My log files (on PII350):
>
>depth time nodes score variation
>-------------------------------------------
>4 0 32645 642 a4c4 e8g6 f6g7 f8g7
>5 0 47790 617 a4c4 e8g6 f6g7 f8g7 c4c8 a8c8 c1c6
>5 1 113700 103 a4c4 e8h5 f6h4 h5h4 b5d6
>5 3 252391 258 f6h4 c8d7 h4e7 d7b5 e7f8
>5 6 528533 399 d3f4 e5f4 a4c4 e8g6 f6g7 f8g7 b5d4
>5 6 573825 431 b5c7 e8h5 f6h4 h5h4 c7a8
>5 7 632420 431 b5c7 e8h5 f6h4 h5h4 c7a8
>6 7 654095 456 b5c7 e8h5 f6h4 h5h4 c7a8 e7d5
>6 7 691845 473 b5c7 e8a4 b3a4 a8b8 c7b5 g7g6 f6e7
>7 10 1013299 448 b5c7 e8h5 f6h4 h5h4 d3e5
>7 22 2209232 -42992 b5c7 e8h5 f6h4 h5h4 f1d1 h4h2 g1f1 h2h1 f1g1
>c8d7
>7 40 3856952 83 d3e5 e8h5 f6h4 h5h4 e5g4 c8g4 f3g4
>7 1.9 6426972 264 d3f4 e5f4 b5c7 e8a4 b3a4 a8b8 c7b5 g7g6 f6e7
>
>
>second position
>
>depth time nodes score variation
>-------------------------------------------
>4 0 34172 502 f2g3 d6g3 g1h1 g7e5 a7g1 g3g2
>5 0 44765 477 f2g3 d6g3 g1h1 g7e5 a7g1 h3g2 b7g2 g3h4 g1h2
>h4e7
>5 1 107935 434 f2g3 d6g3 g1h1 g7e5 a7g1 h3g2 b7g2 g3h4 g1h2
>h4e7
>6 2 166625 409 f2g3 d6g3 g1h1 g7e5 a7g1 h3e6 e7f5 g6f5
>6 4 334863 372 f2g3 d6g3 g1h1 g7e5 a7g1 h3e6 e7g6 f7g6 g1c5
>7 6 434116 347 f2g3 d6g3 g1h1 g7e5 a7g1 h3e6 e7g6 f7g6 g1c5
>7 19 1496826 244 f2g3 d6g3 g1h1 g7e5 a7g1 h3e6 e7g6 f7g6 b7b4
>g3h3
>7 44 3700185 248 c1c2 g7f6 e7d5 h3f5 a7c5 g3e2 g1f1 d6e5
>8 1.0 5239557 233 c1c2 g7f6 b7f3 d6e7 f3g3 h3f5 a7c5 f5c2 c5e7
>8 1.12 6369533 244 f2g3 d6g3
>9 1.46 9309348 219 f2g3 d6g3 g1h1 g7e5 a7g1 h3e6 e7g6 f7g6 b7h7
>h8h7 c1c7 e5c7 g1d4
>9 2.52 15576796 243 c1c2 g3f1 b7c7 d6c7 c2c7 g7e5 c7b7 f1d2 b1d1
>d2e4
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I'm not sure I understand the question about being amateur, but PostModernist
>>gets both of these in 4 seconds.
>>
>>Andrew
>>
>>PS Which engine is yours?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.