Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Thanks for your entries!

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 01:14:33 04/25/02

Go up one level in this thread


On April 25, 2002 at 01:47:31, Slater Wold wrote:


>>You need to make a "standard" hash size.  Bigger hash == slower NPS.

You seem to be right. OK, what about 64 or better 128MB?

>Here are the results from a single AMD 1.2Ghz TB using 128MB hash:
>
>FM:  756 (9.3s)


Which Fritzmark is it, Fritz 5.32, 6 or 7?


>NPS: 1082k
>
>Using 32MB hash:
>
>FM:  790 (9.9s)
>NPS: 1141k



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.