Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:22:27 04/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2002 at 02:43:41, Tina Long wrote: >On April 25, 2002 at 01:49:36, john c cook wrote: > >>the computer are a lot better than a lot of people belive and it is hard to get >>a win for gm or master all other get killed so if gm can not beat the computer >>than who will play it look like no more computer vs human event to me am i right >>or not > >Yep, you are spot on John, an excellent observation. >I think interest in Computer vs Hunan (sic) matches has completely died out. >I doubt if anybody will ever actually play against their own software ever >again. >I think the Kramnik - Fritz match will be cancelled too, as nobody has shown any >interest in that whatsoever. > >The only thing left to do is match software against software. Software against humans is also possible in the right conditions. I believe that every player with a rating of at least 1500 who knows something about computers can beat every program in a match when you only let me to choose the initial position and the program is going to have to play the same position with white and black. A program that can play perfect chess can get a score of at least 1-1 against 1500 players in these conditions but I believe that 1500 players can get 2-0 against everything. The match is going to be fair in the meaning that not the 1500 player and not the program are going to do previous analysis of the position that I compose and the first time that the sides are going to see the position is in the beginning of the first game. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.