Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: will any other computer vs hunan event take place

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 03:44:12 04/25/02

Go up one level in this thread


On April 25, 2002 at 06:07:04, Michael Vox wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I do not think Human vs Bot games are over yet.  I think you better check the
>scoreboard Smirin 3.5 vs Bots 2.5.
>
>http://www.chessbase.com/events/events.asp?pid=122
>
>If it was a blow-out for either side then there would be no interest.  I
>appreciated Smirin's fortress against Hiarcs.  In fact, based on the two games
>H8 has played I would say it is the strongest program.
>
>On April 25, 2002 at 04:22:27, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On April 25, 2002 at 02:43:41, Tina Long wrote:
>>
>>>On April 25, 2002 at 01:49:36, john c cook wrote:
>>>
>>>>the computer are a lot better than a lot of people belive and it is hard to get
>>>>a win for gm or master all other get killed so if gm can not beat the computer
>>>>than who will play it look like no more computer vs human event to me am i right
>>>>or not
>
>You mean like Dr. Hyatt who keeps stating bots are barely GM, yet his Crafty(C)
>program at ICC is playing at GM level for some time now!
>
>>>Yep, you are spot on John, an excellent observation.
>>>I think interest in Computer vs Hunan (sic) matches has completely died out.
>
>When these NOW powerhouse programs showed up in a big way 10 to 15 years ago a
>match between say MChess Pro against ChessMaster could draw crowds to watch, but
>after a few years nobody would show up!
>
>However, against big names like Kramnik people will still show up.
>
>>>I doubt if anybody will ever actually play against their own software ever
>>>again.
>
>Well, it depends on the software, I can still beat some of the freeware
>programs, however; I agree with you that I cannot beat my best programs, F7, J7
>and Hiarcs7.32 etc..
>
>CB has recognized this and has incorporated playchess.com in their program.
>This will help to maintain sales and presumably they will begin charging a fee
>once enough people start going there.  I noticed the Players club was up to 300
>players, not bad.  I am sure they have a target level of members at which point
>they will begin charging.  Playchess.com software still has allot of bugs and
>problems to resolve.  I don't think they even have a SpeedTrap there yet.  Not
>enough resources, and (C)heating at Playchess.com is so easy and prevalent,
>SpeedTrap there would be like giving out speeding tickets at the INDY 500 road
>race :)
>
>My rating is between 1700 and 1800 ELO so I am considered a strong club player.
>I do not play against my best software, it is to strong, however; I do use the
>other features, in particular the Analysis Engine.  This tool has improved my
>chess immeasurably.  If it were a hundred years ago, I would still be around
>1400 ELO.  My location is rather isolated for finding (H)umans to play against.
>We can now with a flick of a switch at any time play a GM, it will beat us, no
>laughing at us and then it shows us our mistakes, now that we should be thankful
>for.
>
>>>I think the Kramnik - Fritz match will be cancelled too, as nobody has shown any
>>>interest in that whatsoever.
>
>The Kramnik match will happen when Kramnik gets around to playing it!  The money
>is in place.  He is simply delaying so he can practice more against F7.  I
>believe there is allot of interest in the match, but certainly not as much as
>the Kaspy vs DB match.  Blame Kramnik not the bot in this one :)
>
>>>The only thing left to do is match software against software.
>
>We already have this at ICCA etc..  We are still a long way off when the best a
>human can do is a draw against a bot.
>
>>Software against humans is also possible in the right conditions.
>>
>>I believe that every player with a rating of at least 1500 who knows something
>>about computers can beat every program in a match when you only let me to choose
>>the initial position and the program is going to have to play the same position
>>with white and black.
>
>Yes, but why make such a ridiculous statement.  If I take the bots pieces from
>it in the setup and I have all of mine, I will win.  So why make this analogy ?


No

in this case the result is going to be 1-1 because I am talking about a match of
2games when you get also the position of the opponent.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.