Author: James T. Walker
Date: 05:59:11 04/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2002 at 04:14:33, Harald Faber wrote: >On April 25, 2002 at 01:47:31, Slater Wold wrote: > > >>>You need to make a "standard" hash size. Bigger hash == slower NPS. > >You seem to be right. OK, what about 64 or better 128MB? > >>Here are the results from a single AMD 1.2Ghz TB using 128MB hash: >> >>FM: 756 (9.3s) > > >Which Fritzmark is it, Fritz 5.32, 6 or 7? > > >>NPS: 1082k >> >>Using 32MB hash: >> >>FM: 790 (9.9s) >>NPS: 1141k Hello Harold, Since you are the one asking for the Fritz marks you should specify what exactly you want. Also since it's only a comparison number, the actual amount of hash is important only in the sense that every one who wishes to contribute should be able to provide that setting. So next time ask for something like: Please provide your CPU/Mhz, and Fritz mark + NPS for Fritz 7 using 64M hash table (or Fritz 5.32 your choice). Just a suggestion but otherwise it will be hard to compare the numbers. Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.