Author: Chris Carson
Date: 07:27:19 04/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2002 at 10:16:13, Roy Eassa wrote: >On April 25, 2002 at 07:42:13, Chris Carson wrote: > >>On April 24, 2002 at 13:38:13, Vicente Fernández wrote: >> >>>On April 23, 2002 at 13:51:16, Sune Larsson wrote: >>>Does anybody remember the match between Guil Russek and Rebel Century? I think >>>it ilustrates very well, though with a relatively older rebel version, what the >>>result would be like. >>>Vicente >> >>Yes, you have a good memory. >> >>Match: Jan, 2000. Rebel Century on K6-400Mhz, time 40/2 + SD/30, Russek 2395, 4 >>game match. >> >>Rebel won 3-1 (2 wins, 2 draws) for a TPR of 2595. >> >>My gues is that Rebel (latest version) on an AMD 1.9Ghz machine would increase >>the performance to 3.5 (3 wins, one draw) for a TPR of 2695, oh I forgot, it >>just got that performance against a 2700 GM who played 100 preparation games >>before the match. :) > > >Chris, of course you are joking. I know that you are way too smart to believe >that results against one human (or a small set of humans) PROVES that such will >be the results against ALL humans forever more, or that humans can NEVER devise >better anti-computer techniques. The above is fact. I nerver said the words "Proves" or "Never". However, the comps have played enough games to establish themselves as strong GM players. > >I also refuse to believe for one moment that you would have been one of those >people who said that man could NEVER build heavier-than-air devices that can fly >just because they hadn't yet at some point in the past, or that organ >transplants would NEVER be possible because they hadn't yet been performed >successfully at some point in the past. Ofcourse people can adapt and create new developments. Comercial programs that play like strong GM's is another example.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.