Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 06:49:13 04/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 26, 2002 at 09:30:58, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 26, 2002 at 09:00:23, Mark Young wrote: > >>On April 25, 2002 at 21:35:41, Amir Ban wrote: >> >>>On April 25, 2002 at 21:26:59, Michael Vox wrote: >>> >>>>On April 25, 2002 at 21:14:14, Amir Ban wrote: >>>> >>>>Hello Amir, >>>> >>>>Thank you for posting this message. >>>> >>>>What items would you like to see changed in future computer events to stop these >>>>problems and others from happening ? >>> >>>I don't know. I guess this would not have happened if the game were played in >>>the old-fashioned way on a wooden board with a wood & metal clock. When >>>everything is wired and automatic, everything has to work perfectly, or else ... >>> >>>I'm not complaining, Smirin is not complaining, I hope the viewers are not >>>complaining. It's just a game. >>> >>>Amir >> >>It is more then a game. This is a money match, and a rare GM Vs Computer match. >>By giving a player a chance to achieve a full point, when at best he could only >>hope for ½ point makes the decision to null the game a very bad one. > >I do not agree. >The fact that money is involved does not change the fact that it is just a game. > >I think that it is going to be fair to find if Junior can win that game when the >opponent does not resign and if it can do it to consider the game as a win. > >If Junior cannot do it then it is fair to see it as a draw. > >It is possible to count also the next game for calculating the result of smirin >and I see no problem with the fact that smirin gets 3 games against Junior >instead of 2 games. > >Uri Will this be an entire new game or will it be played from the end of the previous opening moves of yesterday game. Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.