Author: Keith Ian Price
Date: 16:01:38 04/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 28, 2002 at 18:51:24, Roy Eassa wrote: >On April 28, 2002 at 18:23:02, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>On April 28, 2002 at 18:19:23, Roy Eassa wrote: >> >>>What do you say to Keith Ian Price, who repeated has posted like the following: >>> >>> >>>"I was following the game with Chess Tiger 14.0 running on a P4 2.2Ghz, just as >>>GT was to have been. CT 14.0 agreed with every move that was played by GT. After >>>about 1 minute GT switches to g4, but CT does not even after 3 minutes. I >>>believe they were playing Chess Tiger not Gambit Tiger." >>> >>>One example: >>> >>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?226644 >> >>Christophe already answered...please look: >>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?226655 > > >I saw that, but it does not address the evidence presented. I guess bottom line >there are 3 possibilities: > >a) Tiger 14 did play > >b) Keith is mistaken in some way but not lying > >c) Keith is lying > >I guess "a" seems most likely to me, and "c" least likely. "c" is definitiely not the case. I acknowledged the possibility of case "b" by prefacing "I believe..." rather than "This proves...", but I posted because "a" seemed most likely to me, as well. kp
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.