Author: pavel
Date: 00:50:21 04/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2002 at 03:25:37, Janosch Zwerensky wrote:
>
>>Actually the irony of the game result was not that smirin won this match, but
>>"how" it won the match.
>>At one stage of the game it looked as if Smirin could make GT do whatever it
>>wanted it to do, he "seemed" to be in total control of the game most of the
>>time, even though the program's analysis say otherwise.
>
>I for one would have preferred to be black rather than white in the position
>before Bxa1.
>Why do you think he was ("seemed to be"?) in "total control of the game most of
>the time"?
Isnt blunder part of the gamer?
If there wasnt any blunder by any players and it was a perfect game then all the
games would be draw!
Yes, I guess it is true, we all like to make fun of the blunders GMs make while
they are playing, and while we sit in our home and pop in our favourite chess
engine and think how stupid this GM or the chess program is.
I said that --->
>Why do you think he was ("seemed to be"?) in "total control of the game most of
>the time"?
because I am not sure if he was in total control in the first half of the game,
I dont know about you, but I dont think like a 2700 level player ;)
pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.