Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 05:48:40 04/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2002 at 08:28:56, Sune Fischer wrote: >On April 29, 2002 at 07:51:42, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>On April 29, 2002 at 07:14:39, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>I think we can make two conclusion, even if one game is played later: >>> >>>1) Motivated super GM can still beat all PC programs >>>2) There isn't any program, which is specially good against humans >>> >>>Point 1) is actually good - there is still room for improvement, even if it's >>>unnecessary for 99,9999% of chess players. >>>Point 2) Fritz is as good as any program to play Kramnik. And with 8 CPU system >>>it can at least make interesting games. >>> >>>Jouni >> >>Point 1) is still far to be proven (..all PC programs is absolutely wrong), >>you're too optimistic and Smirin was a bit too lucky in the match. >> >>Point 2) is also not true, since some programs , e.g. Rebel , demonstrated to be >>very effective against humans. > >I don't know why you would think Rebel could any better than Hiarcs or Tiger? > >-S. I didn't say that, but anyway Rebel clearly demonstrated a robust performance against strong humans (you probably miss Ed's organized match...) w.b.r. Otello >> >>w.b.r. >>Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.