Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 06:13:43 04/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2002 at 08:48:40, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On April 29, 2002 at 08:28:56, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>On April 29, 2002 at 07:51:42, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >> >>>On April 29, 2002 at 07:14:39, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>I think we can make two conclusion, even if one game is played later: >>>> >>>>1) Motivated super GM can still beat all PC programs >>>>2) There isn't any program, which is specially good against humans >>>> >>>>Point 1) is actually good - there is still room for improvement, even if it's >>>>unnecessary for 99,9999% of chess players. >>>>Point 2) Fritz is as good as any program to play Kramnik. And with 8 CPU system >>>>it can at least make interesting games. >>>> >>>>Jouni >>> >>>Point 1) is still far to be proven (..all PC programs is absolutely wrong), >>>you're too optimistic and Smirin was a bit too lucky in the match. >>> >>>Point 2) is also not true, since some programs , e.g. Rebel , demonstrated to be >>>very effective against humans. >> >>I don't know why you would think Rebel could any better than Hiarcs or Tiger? >> >>-S. > >I didn't say that, but anyway Rebel clearly demonstrated a robust performance >against strong humans (you probably miss Ed's organized match...) > >w.b.r. >Otello I would like to see a match beween Rebel Century XP and GM Smirin at standard time control. After watching him demolish those programs at G/60 plus 10; I don't think that Schoeder would pit his creation against GM Smirin. Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.