Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:01:09 04/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2002 at 11:54:33, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On April 29, 2002 at 11:50:43, Harald Faber wrote: > >>This is a known problem, yes, but speaking of "out-evaluated" does not hit the >>point (or do you mean only this one game?). Many other games will come (have >>come, look at Chris Taylors games) where Hiarcs mis-evaluates some positions. In >>most cases it is enough to come up with 2-3 losses in which you find >>"mis-evaluations". > > >i see. > >hiarcs loses because its mis-evaulates. >and fritz because it has no other evaluation than 0.00 and a random-number. I suspect that Fritz lost because of null move pruning. I did not analyze the game but based on watching the game hiarcs had no idea how to get progress for many moves. 94.Nf5 seems to me better but I did not analyze to be sure if this was the losing mistake of white. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.