Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 09:25:04 04/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2002 at 12:05:00, Uri Blass wrote: >Tania asked for information about games of Fritz7 against Hiarcs8. >Thorsten posted some information. > >I see no reason to get angry. > >Saying that Fritz had a better evaluation in one game is a legitimate opinion. >This is the way that I understood the header. > >Uri i wrote out-evaluated with a :-)) behind. in this game fritz shows the typical 0.00 which is, as you saw it too, a system-immanent problem of how fritz works. its of course not an evaluation. it only says: here i do not have a senseful evaluation due to the way my search works. but - as usual when i see fritz in its 0.00 stage, i see the opponent increase its score and win the game. if this is the price for speed. ok. i have no idea why she jumps on a pgn. maybe the reason is that i posted it. i have hiarcs one 2 machines running. ONE is 1200 and the other 400 mhz. my idea was that it makes more sense for me to watch hiarcs playing on ONE autoplayer against opponent A while playing on another pair against opponent B. since shredder6 paderborn is IMO stronger than fritz7, i gave the better machines to the pairing shredder-hiarcs. if it is a mistake i do apologize.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.