Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 10:10:06 04/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2002 at 12:26:15, Uri Blass wrote: >It is possible that the computers could play also better at 40/2 hours and even >if you assume that the computers play the same I am not sure if he could win the >better positions at 40/2 hours. > I agree. Two things that favours comps at 40/2h : 1) Computer can deepen very much the analysis at 40/2 and reach elo level far better than shorter reflection time. 2) Humans tends to fatigue mentally in the long run. Any objections ? w.b.r. Otello >He had the advantage against hiarcs and had a winning position against Junior >but I am not sure if he could win both games. >Remember that humans do not play perfect even at 2 hours/40 moves. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.