Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 10:47:36 04/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2002 at 12:26:15, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 29, 2002 at 11:01:28, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On April 29, 2002 at 07:51:42, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >> >>>On April 29, 2002 at 07:14:39, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>I think we can make two conclusion, even if one game is played later: >>>> >>>>1) Motivated super GM can still beat all PC programs >>>>2) There isn't any program, which is specially good against humans >>>> >>>>Point 1) is actually good - there is still room for improvement, even if it's >>>>unnecessary for 99,9999% of chess players. >>>>Point 2) Fritz is as good as any program to play Kramnik. And with 8 CPU system >>>>it can at least make interesting games. >>>> >>>>Jouni >>> >>>Point 1) is still far to be proven (..all PC programs is absolutely wrong), >>>you're too optimistic and Smirin was a bit too lucky in the match. >> >>Smirin was a "bit lucky"? Had the second and third games been played at >>40/2hr he would have been 3-0 after three games. He was winning in all >>three but time caused two of them to become draws. > > >It is not so clear. > >It is possible that the computers could play also better at 40/2 hours and even >if you assume that the computers play the same I am not sure if he could win the >better positions at 40/2 hours. > >He had the advantage against hiarcs and had a winning position against Junior >but I am not sure if he could win both games. >Remember that humans do not play perfect even at 2 hours/40 moves. > >Uri No but they certainly play a lot "more perfect" there than they do with 10 or 15 minutes left on the clock for the rest of the game...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.