Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 13:32:18 04/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2002 at 16:17:19, Chris Carson wrote: >On April 29, 2002 at 16:04:41, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>On April 29, 2002 at 15:49:15, Roy Eassa wrote: >> >>>I'm pretty sure that even for those people the results show a consistent >>>improvement against computers at progressively longer time controls. >> >>Yes, of course, but in different measure than average people. >> >>This is from a pre-match interview of Smirin from >>http://www.kasparovchess.com/serve/templates/folders/show.asp?p_docID=20898&p_docLang=EN >> >> >>Q:What do you think about the time control? >> >>Smirin:I don’t complain about it! Of course if we’d play with classical controls >>my chances would increase significantly, but I think the one used is okay as >>well. >> >>w.b.r. >>Otello > >Well said, here is another interesting quote: > >Q:How would you evaluate the strength of the chess programs you are going to >compete with and do you see the differences between the programs which may >influence your play one way or another? > >In my opinion they are extremely strong, I’d say about 2700 or even higher. I >don’t see a big difference between the programs, although I’m pretty sure all of >them have their stronger and weaker sides. The stronger he makes his opponents out to be, the stronger he seems when he defeats them.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.