Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:26:54 04/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2002 at 12:16:27, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On April 29, 2002 at 11:10:15, Chessfun wrote: > >>"of course" that's the best you can do?..lol > >of course is the best i can do when in a computerchess-group >somebody asks for examples and i do post a pgn and someone >jumps on me and comments rubbish because he has whatever problems. The question referred to what you choose to write in the header of the message. But as you say "somebody asks for examples and i do post *a* pgn". >IMO your behaviour is extremely OFF TOPIC. > >maybe you could be ON TOPIC when you would post your 100 lighting games. Off Topic. My original post simply critiqued your header and the fact that one game proves nothing. You from there choose to attack me, I simply defended myself. In much the same way as I will now procede to do in reply to your latest attack. >>you have no idea about computerchess or math, right ? > >that could be. One game = 40 moves >but is that really interesting ? It is to the extent you originally questioned my knowledge of computer chess. >i don't think it is important to talk about me. i am not important. I agree. >the ssdf also tests in 40/120. >maybe one should tell them how unimportant there work is. >would you do this part for me. i am too busy in the moment. Strange you can normally find the time. Myself I have no problem with what the SSDF does. They present results in an unbiased manner. Have a look as some headers, I think you'll get the picture. >>But i'll let you in on a secret. >>My 100 games would give me some idea of the book of the two programs as I'd see >>the scores out of book. And what is it we learn from your single game >>posting....absolutely nothing as usual. > >the books are unimportant. >or do you believe fritz would play better against hiarcs without book ? The books are important, and naturally make up a certain amount of a programs total rating. What do the SSDF (as you choose to bring them up) test with?. The original books. >>As if posting one single game, with the header you used isn't a waste of time. >>A waste of time for people who read it and for people who take note in such >>rubbish. > >nobody forces you to read my posts. >i do not read your posts about your fast speed tournaments too. And as far as the results I present, I present far more than lightning. A quick check back through the last 7 days history would show you. And I also maintain a seperate list of slower control games which currently consists of over 6000 games. But naturally you already know that. >>Yep I can just see it now. Let me set up my PC's for this great "KS-400" >>autoplayed game. If you'd have used something a little faster you could have >>saved yourself a few hours. Chris Taylor already posted a score "series" using >>AMD 1700's. > >right. >i have seen that. >different to YOUR posts i do read HIS posts. You don't read my posts. Then what are you doing replying to one?. Agh but you don't read them.....now I see. >but now ... i see things much better. thank you cheesfun. You're very welcome !! >>No I simply present a series of statistics without bias, something you have >>always seemed unable to achieve. > >you present statistics. has ever anyone presented a statistic that was not >USED for his own interests and therefore faked ? I'm sure they have. In certain cases also they like to put elaborate headers to them when they post them. >but i am sure YOURS is not biased. >HOW GOOD !! Thank you, that's sweet of you to say so. >than i can sleep well- > > >>Agh is that what you were doing, "sharing". Well speaking for myself maybe next >>time you can share with a little more balance. >> >>Sarah. > >Balance ?? > >what shall i do when fritz loses ? >feed it with drugs ? The balance refers to what is written in the header of a message. Maybe that's a translation issue, next time I'll try to make it more clear ;-) Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.