Author: Ferdinand S. Mosca
Date: 14:48:03 04/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2002 at 15:58:01, Chris Taylor wrote: >On April 29, 2002 at 15:37:41, Roy Eassa wrote: > >>On April 29, 2002 at 15:26:57, Chris Taylor wrote: >> >>>Both programs had 196Mb hash and own opening books. Both had access to all >>>5.4.3 piece endgame bases. One hour games, 8 played.... >>> >>>J7 v H8 4-4 >>> >>>H8 +3 -3 =2 >>> >>>Only a small number of games yet again....... >>> >>>Gambit Tiger is playing at the moment >>> >>>Chris. >> >> >>Maybe Hiarcs 8 will join the crowd of programs that are all very close to the >>same strength (IMO) and all somewhat weaker than Fritz 7 but somewhat stronger >>than Hiarcs 7.32. That crowd includes Junior 7, Chess Tiger 14, Gambit Tiger 2, >>Shredder 6.02, and probably Deep Fritz 6. (Chessmaster 8's strength is still a >>mystery to me.) > >I will be playing the same format, for more of the top engines. By this look at >SSDF lists or Chessfuns list! I will still not have enough games to form an >opinion as to the strenth of these engines. But I think it is fun! > >I want to do longer time settings, but this means less games, or leave the >computers to play longer. > >How does 30 moves in 30 mins x 2, then 1 hour to finish the games sound? >2 hours per game, sort of.......... > >Chris. Hello Chris, Just a suggestion Chris, 2 hrs is good, and I like to see 40 moves/90min (lets see time management handling and creativity) + 40 moves/25min (see speed chess) + rest 5 minutes (see efficiency). Much better if fixed different kinds of opening and reversed color, but not necessarily nunn test positions. I don't need hundreds of games I just want to examine moves/positons in games on a slower time control on a different openings. Regards, Dinan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.