Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Longer time controls

Author: Keith Ian Price

Date: 14:49:35 04/29/02

Go up one level in this thread


On April 29, 2002 at 16:37:28, Otello Gnaramori wrote:

>On April 29, 2002 at 16:17:19, Chris Carson wrote:
>
>>Well said, here is another interesting quote:
>>
>>Q:How would you evaluate the strength of the chess programs you are going to
>>compete with and do you see the differences between the programs which may
>>influence your play one way or another?
>>
>>In my opinion they are extremely strong, I’d say about 2700 or even higher. I
>>don’t see a big difference between the programs, although I’m pretty sure all of
>>them have their stronger and weaker sides.
>
>A word of warning Chris , since some people here can get upset if somebody is
>trying to elo rate the programs so high.
>This upsetting is totally independent from who rates the comps ,infact they can
>be one of the world strongest GM and anticomputer chess expert and moreover have
>a degree in computer science (casually that's Smirin portrait).
>
>w.b.r.
>Otello

Smirin also stated before the match that he has not played a computer since
1996, up to the preparation for the match, so I would not call him an expert.
There are far more anti-computer experts on ICC that Smirin could easily crush,
but who would fare better against the computers than he. Since he had not played
any computers since 1996, I think his statement is more due to shock about the
increased strength of the computers since he last played them, than about hype
for the match. After the match, any comments about their strength will have more
meaning.

kp



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.