Author: Keith Ian Price
Date: 16:08:29 04/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2002 at 18:57:08, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On April 29, 2002 at 18:40:41, Keith Ian Price wrote: > >>And my answer was in my statement. When he did play some computers to prepare, >>his estimation of their strength was colored by the great increase in strength >>that he noticed after not playing them for so long. Had he been playing >>computers all along, I think he would have a different opinion. More like 2550, >>not 2700. YMMV, actually YMWV, I'm sure. :) >> >>kp > >Ok, I see your point now. >But if he said 2700 and possibly more as he said, there must be some good >reasons , beyond first impressions. > >w.b.r. >Otello Why? It is a preparation for a match, not a deep study of computer chess and program ratings. Should he do differently than most people here? This forum is riddled with pre-conceptions and wild statements based on first impressions. It's one of the attractions of this place for me... kp
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.