Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 16:11:26 04/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2002 at 17:26:54, Chessfun wrote: >Off Topic. My original post simply critiqued your header and the fact that one >game proves nothing. correction: one game proves nothing for you. and i know why. >You from there choose to attack me, I simply defended >myself. i attacked you ? > In much the same way as I will now procede to do in reply to your latest >attack. aha. so who defends and who attackes in israel. i think this is the same question. >One game = 40 moves = 80 times computation on both sides, = 300 main lines = 250 scores = many many events to take care on. how do you manage to take care on relating all those events in a 3 or 5 minute game ??? >And as far as the results I present, I present far more than lightning. >A quick check back through the last 7 days history would show you. And I also >maintain a seperate list of slower control games which currently consists of >over 6000 games. But naturally you already know that. 6000 beans. is more than 6.4 beans. no. i don't know how many beans you have. i do not count beans. i don't read your posts in general. beans do bore me. and counting beans bores me too. >You don't read my posts. Then what are you doing replying to one?. Agh but you >don't read them.....now I see. right. i make an exception. i thought you would like to comment on the game i posted. instead, you behave off topic. normally i do not read your posts. numbers. numbers . numbers. unimportant for me. i do not count numbers, money, girls, kisses. i live them. but i do not count them- there are things, you cannot count.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.