Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Rubbish

Author: Peter Berger

Date: 16:33:02 04/29/02

Go up one level in this thread


On April 29, 2002 at 14:48:51, Harald Faber wrote:

>1. The time management is different if you play blitz or 40/120.
>2. The only data I have got is that Shredder did and maybe still does much worse
>in g/180 than in 40/120+60 although all in all this is almost the same time
>control. If the results would be almost identical, you are right. My experience
>showed me s.th. different.
>I do not have the machines to prove that, sorry. And there will be no proof
>until someone does the test.

That's compairing apples with pears ( German picture). I know and understand
that Blitz, Fisher and n moves/m minutes time control might be implemented in a
_very_ different way.

I only want to compair same kind of time controls, like in the comparison
described by you. There really is no major difference I think, Harald.

40/120 on PIII500 ~= 40/60 on PIII1000 I think.

Peter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.