Author: Chessfun
Date: 17:11:47 04/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2002 at 18:56:41, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On April 29, 2002 at 17:31:40, Chessfun wrote: >>In >>fact I find it funny how you can come to any opinion after one game. > >:-))) > >chessfun :-)) > >i see that for you it is fun And what is it for you a profession?. >you can relate the engine X versus engine X-1 (in this case relate hiarcs8 to >hiacrs7 on a 3rd machine) to find out about the difference. And you see all that in one game and then post a header which is based alone on your biased opinion against Fritz. And seeing Hiarcs 7 on that 3rd machine for that single game certainly don't tell you the difference between the two. It may give you ideas on certain aspects but your single game tells nothing. >believe me, you can get much information out of ONE game. You may get information from that single game, but it means nothing unless more games confirm whatever it is you may think you found out. >especially when you are used to watch computers and main lines and scores for >more than 20 years. Ah yes, older and wiser.....or simply older?. >i can read st.exupery or schopenhauer or nietzsche while watching the programs, >and would get more information out of one game than you would get out of your >lightning games. Read whatever you like, assume you get something out of the *game* you play, fine with me. But if you post a *Rubbish* statement after playing that one game then I'll call it what it is. >i let you yours. you can let me mine. If letting you yours, includes letting you make statements which are based on your biased opinions....I think not. You can keep them and are welcome to them but don't expect to post headers which clearly show how little you know and expect them to be left. >but its silly to call ONE game less significant than 100 lightning games, >only because you don't see although having eyes and ears open. Less significant wasn't the words I choose. The exact wording was; "I would rather see 100 lightning games than one game which tells anyone absolutely nothing." And I think the simple fact is your "one game" is proof of nothing. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.