Author: Harald Faber
Date: 02:34:27 04/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2002 at 19:33:02, Peter Berger wrote: >On April 29, 2002 at 14:48:51, Harald Faber wrote: > >>1. The time management is different if you play blitz or 40/120. >>2. The only data I have got is that Shredder did and maybe still does much worse >>in g/180 than in 40/120+60 although all in all this is almost the same time >>control. If the results would be almost identical, you are right. My experience >>showed me s.th. different. >>I do not have the machines to prove that, sorry. And there will be no proof >>until someone does the test. > >That's compairing apples with pears ( German picture). I know and understand >that Blitz, Fisher and n moves/m minutes time control might be implemented in a >_very_ different way. > >I only want to compair same kind of time controls, like in the comparison >described by you. There really is no major difference I think, Harald. > >40/120 on PIII500 ~= 40/60 on PIII1000 I think. > >Peter Yes, you THINK. I am not sure about that. IMO this lacks a proof.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.