Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 03:16:06 04/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2002 at 00:39:55, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 29, 2002 at 23:55:11, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On April 29, 2002 at 21:28:21, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>Interesting Fritz 1 on a Celeron 433 Mhz search up to depth 13, but Comet B42 on >>>the same Celeron 433 Mhz can only search up to depth 12. This is when I set it >>>up to game in 30 minutes. Of course that Comet B42 is about 350 Elo points >>>higher than Fritz 1, but Comet B42 could be optimized to search higher than 12. >>> >>>Pichard. >> >> >> >>Where have you seen that Comet is 350 elo points higher than Fritz 1.0??? >> >> >> >> Christophe > >I do not know about the rating difference but Comet is certainly stronger than >Fritz1. > >I do not care about the depthes. >It is impossible to compare depths of different programs and I guess that >CometB42 can see at depth 12 more than what Fritz1 can see at depth 13 and I >think about tactics and not about positional understanding. > >Uri I wasn't comparing depthes to strength, all that I mentioned was that it was interesting to see the first ptogram by Frans "Fritz 1" to be able to search at Depth 13 on a Celeron 433 Mhz. The knowledge of Fritz 1 in 1991 Could NOT be compared to Comet B42, but by being able to search at that depth and reaching a rating of 2008 in a mere 386/25 Mhz was impressived. 71 Fritz 1.0 386/25-33 MHz 2008 66 -67 113 46% 2039 72 Novag Diablo 68000 16 MHz 2008 21 -22 1080 41% 2071 73 Fidelity Mach III 68000 16 MHz 1993 14 -14 2404 52% 1980 Pichard.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.