Author: Peter Berger
Date: 04:01:46 04/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2002 at 05:34:27, Harald Faber wrote: >On April 29, 2002 at 19:33:02, Peter Berger wrote: > >>On April 29, 2002 at 14:48:51, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>>1. The time management is different if you play blitz or 40/120. >>>2. The only data I have got is that Shredder did and maybe still does much worse >>>in g/180 than in 40/120+60 although all in all this is almost the same time >>>control. If the results would be almost identical, you are right. My experience >>>showed me s.th. different. >>>I do not have the machines to prove that, sorry. And there will be no proof >>>until someone does the test. >> >>That's compairing apples with pears ( German picture). I know and understand >>that Blitz, Fisher and n moves/m minutes time control might be implemented in a >>_very_ different way. >> >>I only want to compair same kind of time controls, like in the comparison >>described by you. There really is no major difference I think, Harald. >> >>40/120 on PIII500 ~= 40/60 on PIII1000 I think. >> >>Peter > >Yes, you THINK. I am not sure about that. IMO this lacks a proof. I agree, Harald, but I would adress this just the other way around. If I can think of no good reason why there should be any difference I'd probably assume there is none until the opposite is proven. Kind regards, Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.