Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 04:04:47 04/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2002 at 06:04:01, Marc van Hal wrote: > >No Analyses just played from the position before 14..f6 >By the same Botvinik personelety and Chessmaster pos >I can asure you that after 14..Rad8 Gambit Tiger would have walked the same path >I also have doubts Smirnin real knew what was going on in these games by reading >his coments. > >Botvinnik pers - Chessmasterpos >29.04.2002 > >1.Nf3 d5 2.g3 Nf6 3.Bg2 c5 4.0-0 Nc6 5.d3 e5 6.Nbd2 Be7 7.e4 0-0 8.c3 Bg4 9.h3 >Bc8 10.Re1 d4 11.Nc4 Qc7 12.a4 Be6 13.Bd2 Nd7 14.Qc2 Rad8 > >[14...f6 15.Rec1 Nb6 16.Nxb6 axb6 17.cxd4 cxd4 18.b4 Qd7 19.b5 Na5 20.Bxa5 Rfc8 >21.Qd2 Rxa5 22.h4 Kf8 23.h5 Rca8 24.h6 g6 25.Qc2 Bb4 26.Qc7 Bc3 27.Qxb6 Qe7 >28.Kh2 g5 29.Nd2 Bxa1 30.Rc7 Qd8 31.Bh3 g4 32.Bxg4 Bxg4 33.Qc5+ Ke8 34.Rxh7 Rc8 >35.Rh8+ Kf7 36.Rxd8 Rxc5 37.h7 Rc8 38.h8Q] > > 15.Ng5 Bxg5 16.Bxg5 f6 17.Bd2 Ndb8 18.f4 dxc3 19.Qxc3 Nb4 20.Bf1 N8c6 21.Be3 >Nd4 22.Bxd4 Rxd4 23.Na3 a6 24.f5 Bf7 25.Be2 Qd7 26.Nc2 Nxc2 27.Qxc2 Rc8 28.a5 >Rb4 29.Reb1 Qd8 30.Kg2 b6 31.axb6 Qxb6 32.Ra4 Rc7 33.Rxb4 cxb4 34.Qd2 Qc5 35.Bd1 >Qd4 36.Rc1 Rxc1 37.Qxc1 g6 38.fxg6 hxg6 39.Be2 a5 40.h4 a4 41.g4 Qd6 42.h5 a3 >43.bxa3 bxa3 44.hxg6 Bxg6 45.Qh6 Kf7 46.g5 fxg5 47.Qh1 Qd4 48.Qc1 a2 49.Qc7+ Kf8 >50.Qb8+ Be8 51.Bh5 Qd7 52.Qxe5 Bxh5 53.Qh8+ Ke7 54.Qg7+ Bf7 55.Qe5+ Qe6 56.Qb2 >Qg4+ 57.Kh2 Qh4+ 58.Kg2 g4 59.Qe5+ Kf8 60.Qc5+ Kg7 61.Qc3+ Kg6 62.Qe5 Qh3+ >63.Kf2 Qf3+ 64.Ke1 g3 65.Qf5+ Qxf5 66.exf5+ Kxf5 67.Kd2 a1Q 68.d4 Qxd4+ 69.Kc1 >Bb3 70.Kb1 Qf2 71.Kc1 Qc2# 0-1 > >Regards Marc When I posted this I already was hasitating if I used 14..Rf-d8 for my analyses Which was treu and best seen By 15.cxd4,cxd4 16.Re-c1 after Which the queensrook belongs on c8. again regards Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.