Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 05:08:28 04/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2002 at 07:15:01, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 30, 2002 at 07:06:18, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > >>On April 30, 2002 at 06:42:55, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On April 30, 2002 at 02:48:17, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >>> >>>>On April 29, 2002 at 23:55:11, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 29, 2002 at 21:28:21, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Interesting Fritz 1 on a Celeron 433 Mhz search up to depth 13, but Comet B42 on >>>>>>the same Celeron 433 Mhz can only search up to depth 12. This is when I set it >>>>>>up to game in 30 minutes. Of course that Comet B42 is about 350 Elo points >>>>>>higher than Fritz 1, but Comet B42 could be optimized to search higher than 12. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pichard. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Where have you seen that Comet is 350 elo points higher than Fritz 1.0??? >>>> >>>>That's certainly overestimated. I 'd expect Fritz1 still being a tough opponent. >>>> >>>>Uli >>> >>>I do not know. >>> >>>I guess that Fritz1 was never tested on the new hardware >>>and it is possible that some bug that is relevant only at slower >>>time control than tournament time control on 386 prevents >>>it to play well. >>> >>>I cannot know based on the data if the claim that >>>Comet is 350 elo better than Fritz1 is correct or not correct >>>because we cannot make conclusions based on the rating >>>of Fritz1 on slow hardware. >>> >>>I know that programs may have bugs at long time control >>>if they are not designed for it. >>> >>>One possible problem is that the order of moves can be wrong >>>at long time control because the program gives score to moves >>>based on some assumptions that are simply wrong >>>at long time control. >>> >>>Uri >> >>I also think, that Fritz1 can be beaten by many of today's amateurs. However, a >>difference of 350 ELO means that Fritz1 would score essentially 0 % ? > >350 elo difference means more than 0%. > >I can avoid losing rating based on the israeli formula >for rating if I lose 22.5-1.5 against an opponent that is >350 elo better than me. Agreed. 1.5-22.5 is "essentially 0" for me. -:) Uli > >The simple linear formula that is used for calculating >the israeli rating is biased when the rating difference is big >so the expected result for the weaker player >is even better than 22.5-1.5. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.