Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Smirnin Gambit Tiger

Author: Marc van Hal

Date: 08:08:29 04/30/02

Go up one level in this thread


On April 30, 2002 at 09:08:09, Wybe K. wrote:

>On April 30, 2002 at 07:04:47, Marc van Hal wrote:
>
>>On April 30, 2002 at 06:04:01, Marc van Hal wrote:
>
>>> I also have doubts Smirnin real knew what was going on in these games by
>>> reading his coments.
>
>Horrible, Smirnin is a 2700+ ELO GM and he doesn't know what to do ?
>So, maybe you've to announce an intellectual match against CM 8000 (with the
>Smirnin pers.) Walk on Marc.
>
>All the best, Wybe
>
>BTW what an exciting game it was.

Who is the one who believes in fantasy you or me?
I already pointed out Sminin did not think here
I also said you could check it before giving coments
Just set up the book moves from the game
And watch at the result of Botvinikpersonelety versus Gambit Tiger
I can asure you it's the same.
He simly played from out memory (By knowing the end result of a computer
computer game without watching the corectness of these moves)
I think that many IM's and GM's who are realy dedicated to the game would suport
this.
Kasparov would say so it is posible to win from a chessprogram by making bad
moves.
And also would give coments on the vague coments givven by Smirnin.(Just like I
did)
Kasparov does not want to play against programs because of the reason that he
loves the game to much to destroy it with nonsens at all costs.
Which program on Which hardware plays doesn't mather aslong as you know the end
result of games which where played by these programs.
And like I said Botvinik versus Gambit Tiger 2 on a 800MHZ machine gave the same
end result as on a 2Gighz machine with the exeption that the Botvinik
personelety might change moves(Which I doubt).
I also can show you games which where realy briliant instead of this sherade if
you look it from a chessprograms point of vieuw.
Then again if you prefer to believe in lies your free to do so.
It only doesn't look to smart.
It looks like the thinking lines off a chessprogram it doesn't realy learn
something from it's mistakes
and does therefor not admit them!
I even would prefer the game he won against Schredder
Which is of more theoretical valeu.
Regards                      a real chessplayer  Marc



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.