Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 08:31:50 04/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2002 at 06:16:06, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>On April 30, 2002 at 00:39:55, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On April 29, 2002 at 23:55:11, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>
>>>On April 29, 2002 at 21:28:21, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>
>>>>Interesting Fritz 1 on a Celeron 433 Mhz search up to depth 13, but Comet B42 on
>>>>the same Celeron 433 Mhz can only search up to depth 12. This is when I set it
>>>>up to game in 30 minutes. Of course that Comet B42 is about 350 Elo points
>>>>higher than Fritz 1, but Comet B42 could be optimized to search higher than 12.
>>>>
>>>>Pichard.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Where have you seen that Comet is 350 elo points higher than Fritz 1.0???
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Christophe
>>
>>I do not know about the rating difference but Comet is certainly stronger than
>>Fritz1.
>>
>>I do not care about the depthes.
>>It is impossible to compare depths of different programs and I guess that
>>CometB42 can see at depth 12 more than what Fritz1 can see at depth 13 and I
>>think about tactics and not about positional understanding.
>>
>>Uri
>
>
>I wasn't comparing depthes to strength, all that I mentioned was that it was
>interesting to see the first ptogram by Frans "Fritz 1" to be able to search at
>Depth 13 on a Celeron 433 Mhz. The knowledge of Fritz 1 in 1991 Could NOT be
>compared to Comet B42, but by being able to search at that depth and reaching a
>rating of 2008 in a mere 386/25 Mhz was impressived.
Match it against Comet and you might be even more surprised.
And after that we will talk again about your supposed 350 elo points difference
between the two and the supposed superiority of knowledge.
Christophe
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.