Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 16:42:01 04/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2002 at 17:26:46, Terry McCracken wrote: >On April 30, 2002 at 11:08:29, Marc van Hal wrote: > >>On April 30, 2002 at 09:08:09, Wybe K. wrote: >> >>>On April 30, 2002 at 07:04:47, Marc van Hal wrote: >>> >>>>On April 30, 2002 at 06:04:01, Marc van Hal wrote: >>> >>>>> I also have doubts Smirnin real knew what was going on in these games by >>>>> reading his coments. >>> >>>Horrible, Smirnin is a 2700+ ELO GM and he doesn't know what to do ? >>>So, maybe you've to announce an intellectual match against CM 8000 (with the >>>Smirnin pers.) Walk on Marc. >>> >>>All the best, Wybe >>> >>>BTW what an exciting game it was. >> >>Who is the one who believes in fantasy you or me? >>I already pointed out Sminin did not think here >>I also said you could check it before giving coments >>Just set up the book moves from the game >>And watch at the result of Botvinikpersonelety versus Gambit Tiger >>I can asure you it's the same. >>He simly played from out memory (By knowing the end result of a computer >>computer game without watching the corectness of these moves) >>I think that many IM's and GM's who are realy dedicated to the game would suport >>this. >>Kasparov would say so it is posible to win from a chessprogram by making bad >>moves. >>And also would give coments on the vague coments givven by Smirnin.(Just like I >>did) >>Kasparov does not want to play against programs because of the reason that he >>loves the game to much to destroy it with nonsens at all costs. >>Which program on Which hardware plays doesn't mather aslong as you know the end >>result of games which where played by these programs. >>And like I said Botvinik versus Gambit Tiger 2 on a 800MHZ machine gave the same >>end result as on a 2Gighz machine with the exeption that the Botvinik >>personelety might change moves(Which I doubt). >>I also can show you games which where realy briliant instead of this sherade if >>you look it from a chessprograms point of vieuw. >>Then again if you prefer to believe in lies your free to do so. >>It only doesn't look to smart. >>It looks like the thinking lines off a chessprogram it doesn't realy learn >>something from it's mistakes >>and does therefor not admit them! >>I even would prefer the game he won against Schredder >>Which is of more theoretical valeu. >>Regards a real chessplayer Marc > > >So you're claiming that all these games were worked out by Smirin ahead of time, >move by move? > >That would be fantasy, indeed!:o) > >Terry Said the fool Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.