Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 18:49:38 04/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2002 at 19:42:01, Marc van Hal wrote: >On April 30, 2002 at 17:26:46, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On April 30, 2002 at 11:08:29, Marc van Hal wrote: >> >>>On April 30, 2002 at 09:08:09, Wybe K. wrote: >>> >>>>On April 30, 2002 at 07:04:47, Marc van Hal wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 30, 2002 at 06:04:01, Marc van Hal wrote: >>>> >>>>>> I also have doubts Smirnin real knew what was going on in these games by >>>>>> reading his coments. >>>> >>>>Horrible, Smirnin is a 2700+ ELO GM and he doesn't know what to do ? >>>>So, maybe you've to announce an intellectual match against CM 8000 (with the >>>>Smirnin pers.) Walk on Marc. >>>> >>>>All the best, Wybe >>>> >>>>BTW what an exciting game it was. >>> >>>Who is the one who believes in fantasy you or me? >>>I already pointed out Sminin did not think here >>>I also said you could check it before giving coments >>>Just set up the book moves from the game >>>And watch at the result of Botvinikpersonelety versus Gambit Tiger >>>I can asure you it's the same. >>>He simly played from out memory (By knowing the end result of a computer >>>computer game without watching the corectness of these moves) >>>I think that many IM's and GM's who are realy dedicated to the game would suport >>>this. >>>Kasparov would say so it is posible to win from a chessprogram by making bad >>>moves. >>>And also would give coments on the vague coments givven by Smirnin.(Just like I >>>did) >>>Kasparov does not want to play against programs because of the reason that he >>>loves the game to much to destroy it with nonsens at all costs. >>>Which program on Which hardware plays doesn't mather aslong as you know the end >>>result of games which where played by these programs. >>>And like I said Botvinik versus Gambit Tiger 2 on a 800MHZ machine gave the same >>>end result as on a 2Gighz machine with the exeption that the Botvinik >>>personelety might change moves(Which I doubt). >>>I also can show you games which where realy briliant instead of this sherade if >>>you look it from a chessprograms point of vieuw. >>>Then again if you prefer to believe in lies your free to do so. >>>It only doesn't look to smart. >>>It looks like the thinking lines off a chessprogram it doesn't realy learn >>>something from it's mistakes >>>and does therefor not admit them! >>>I even would prefer the game he won against Schredder >>>Which is of more theoretical valeu. >>>Regards a real chessplayer Marc >> >> >>So you're claiming that all these games were worked out by Smirin ahead of time, >>move by move? >> >>That would be fantasy, indeed!:o) >> >>Terry > >Said the fool >Marc If you think I'm a fool then you need Thorazine Derivative Marc! Maybe I'd understand you better if you'ld learn to write in English! Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.