Author: Michael Williams
Date: 22:18:28 04/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2002 at 21:56:19, Michael Vox wrote: >On April 30, 2002 at 14:42:50, Jeroen Noomen wrote: > > >Hello Jeroen, > >I sympathize with your plight. It must be difficult to see your hardwork being >utilized by others without a fee. > >I was wondering how you would respond to these arguments: > >1) If someone combined ten opening books including Rebel from various sources >and then edited it, would this still be against the ICCA rules ? How does one >detect the Rebel books or any other of the books ? In fact, at that point is it >even Rebel books anymore ? > >I have seen some huge books for download, presumably this problem has been going >on for some time. > >2) Do you think your statement here at ICC will change anything ? Do you >believe people will stop because of your post here ? It seems your statement is >like trying to hold up the World Trade Centre with words on September 11, 2001. > >Regards, Every single post appearing above this one, that is dated earlier than this one, contain fallacies. Jeroen is completely correct in all matters, specifically, the information was and is used in a specific context, others accrue benefit without compensating him, and many of the attempts at consoling him or rebutting his claim contain the naturalistic fallacy. Please don't heap more pain on the man in this situation.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.