Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 04:00:30 05/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2002 at 21:49:38, Terry McCracken wrote: >On April 30, 2002 at 19:42:01, Marc van Hal wrote: > >>On April 30, 2002 at 17:26:46, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On April 30, 2002 at 11:08:29, Marc van Hal wrote: >>> >>>>On April 30, 2002 at 09:08:09, Wybe K. wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 30, 2002 at 07:04:47, Marc van Hal wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On April 30, 2002 at 06:04:01, Marc van Hal wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> I also have doubts Smirnin real knew what was going on in these games by >>>>>>> reading his coments. >>>>> >>>>>Horrible, Smirnin is a 2700+ ELO GM and he doesn't know what to do ? >>>>>So, maybe you've to announce an intellectual match against CM 8000 (with the >>>>>Smirnin pers.) Walk on Marc. >>>>> >>>>>All the best, Wybe >>>>> >>>>>BTW what an exciting game it was. >>>> >>>>Who is the one who believes in fantasy you or me? >>>>I already pointed out Sminin did not think here >>>>I also said you could check it before giving coments >>>>Just set up the book moves from the game >>>>And watch at the result of Botvinikpersonelety versus Gambit Tiger >>>>I can asure you it's the same. >>>>He simly played from out memory (By knowing the end result of a computer >>>>computer game without watching the corectness of these moves) >>>>I think that many IM's and GM's who are realy dedicated to the game would suport >>>>this. >>>>Kasparov would say so it is posible to win from a chessprogram by making bad >>>>moves. >>>>And also would give coments on the vague coments givven by Smirnin.(Just like I >>>>did) >>>>Kasparov does not want to play against programs because of the reason that he >>>>loves the game to much to destroy it with nonsens at all costs. >>>>Which program on Which hardware plays doesn't mather aslong as you know the end >>>>result of games which where played by these programs. >>>>And like I said Botvinik versus Gambit Tiger 2 on a 800MHZ machine gave the same >>>>end result as on a 2Gighz machine with the exeption that the Botvinik >>>>personelety might change moves(Which I doubt). >>>>I also can show you games which where realy briliant instead of this sherade if >>>>you look it from a chessprograms point of vieuw. >>>>Then again if you prefer to believe in lies your free to do so. >>>>It only doesn't look to smart. >>>>It looks like the thinking lines off a chessprogram it doesn't realy learn >>>>something from it's mistakes >>>>and does therefor not admit them! >>>>I even would prefer the game he won against Schredder >>>>Which is of more theoretical valeu. >>>>Regards a real chessplayer Marc >>> >>> >>>So you're claiming that all these games were worked out by Smirin ahead of time, >>>move by move? >>> >>>That would be fantasy, indeed!:o) >>> >>>Terry >> >>Said the fool >>Marc > > >If you think I'm a fool then you need Thorazine Derivative Marc! > >Maybe I'd understand you better if you'ld learn to write in English! > >Terry Are you always typing with that (key)board before your head? Regards Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.